Chaos is kind of our trademark. So one book has moved from category to the other after we have started reading and we've missed one deadline. Could have been worse! Subjectivity is also our trademark. Which is why our point system means that we can end up with two, or three (or four, last year!) finalists. As demonstrated below. SCIENCE-FICTION Our finalists are:
FANTASY Two incredibly different novels made it to the final, both very worthy of it.
NOVELLAS I may be biased, but I think we have here two of the finest novellas published last year.
SERIES I'm not taking part in the voting in either round for the series category this year, but my fellow jurors have picked two series that have been praised a lot.
BLURRED BOUNDARIES What I love with the Blurred Boundaries category is how these books challenge any attempt at putting them in a box and I wasn't disappointed in the offerings this year again.
Our finalists are:
We are now into the second round. Some of us will re-read, others will attempt to sway the others. We may find new, inventive way to introduce chaos. We will announce the results in August, during WorldCon because a bunch of us will be there. You can follow us on Twitter (we do not argue in the open, though you may find your timeline inundated with gifs) to get the results as we announce them. We are @imyril, @hammard_1987, @runalongwomble, @lazyhedwig, @bluebookballon, @eowyn_w and @themiddleshelf1. Disclaimer: Hammard's bunnies were harmed during the making of these awards. Comments are closed.
|
"While we were reading" is an irregular feature about reading science-fiction and fantasy. It can contain guest posts. Nothing fancy, come as you are.
It is also home to all the Subjective Chaos Kind of Awards announcements. |